Moisture Management (MMT) Test Methods and Acceptable Limits
Moisture Management (MMT) is verified through AATCC 195 moisture management tester. Knowing how the method works avoids rejecting fabric that actually meets the requirement.
Method overview
AATCC 195 moisture management tester defines sample size, conditioning and calculation, so values are comparable only within the same revision. Working figures for Moisture Management (MMT) normally sit around class 3 to 5 for training wear in mainstream production. Note AATCC 195 moisture management tester on the tech pack so nobody tests against an older revision.
Result interpretation
Read the value together with construction notes; class 3 to 5 for training wear is only meaningful for similar fabrics. Record elastane content alongside Moisture Management (MMT), because blends shift the measured value. A result outside class 3 to 5 for training wear usually points to process drift rather than to the fibre itself.
Typical limits
Buyers commonly write class 3 to 5 for training wear with a stated tolerance, then verify against AATCC 195 moisture management tester. Keeping reference values for Moisture Management (MMT) lets suppliers quote without extra sampling rounds. Ask for conditioning details together with AATCC 195 moisture management tester, since both affect the reading.
Sources of variation
Conditioning time, operator technique and shade all influence the result. Working figures for Moisture Management (MMT) normally sit around class 3 to 5 for training wear in mainstream production. Note AATCC 195 moisture management tester on the tech pack so nobody tests against an older revision.
Documentation
Record the standard revision on every report, because older versions can differ from current practice. Record elastane content alongside Moisture Management (MMT), because blends shift the measured value. A result outside class 3 to 5 for training wear usually points to process drift rather than to the fibre itself.
